Referenda are *really* bad ideas

Referenda are *really* bad ideas. 

No average voter can possibly understand, or work out, the complexities of a situation like Brexit, or Scottish Independence, with sufficient clarity to make an informed decision. Not one. 

Both referenda suffered from exactly the same fatal flaws: the campaign people got hold of a few tasty soundbites and cranked up the rhetoric – on both sides – so that these trivial, unverifiable non-specifics became visceral and dominating aspects that defined absolutely everything. 

The Brexiteers were desperate for anything – absolutely anything – to avoid the xenophobic core of their campaign. So fluffy nonsense like “control” started to become talking points. 

The Scottish seperatists, desperate to avoid discussing things that they knew nothing about like EU membership, central banking, currency, debt and a hundred other things, decided on the same wooly concept of self-control as their core message. 

When the major thrust of a campaign is jingoism, then you know, with absolute certainty, that the public is being lied to, is underinformed and is in all likelihood, becoming the victims of massive fraud. They are being asked to make country-changing decisions based on no knowledge whatsoever. Situations like that are ripe for abuse, and abuse has happened on a huge scale. 

What, exactly, did the Brexiters vote for? Most don’t have a clue. Ask them what their estimated trade balance will be in five years, you’ll get a blank look. Ask them about exchange rates, trade tariffs, cross-border policing, environmental issues, replacements for massive EU infrastructure grants, military cooperation, agriculture policy and any number of other things DIRECTLY impacted by their voting decision and you will get a tilted head and a “huh?” But ask them if they want to take back control, and they’ll get all excited because you’ve used a sound bite that they recognise. 

The theory behind a referendum is great – people get to choose their own destiny. That is, of course, crap, because it misses out the most important word. Informed. Informed people get to choose their own destiny. If that happened, then great. 

But it doesn’t, does it? An informed population is a dangerous one. An informed population sees through bullshit quite easily and can’t be lied to so often. Nobody in power wants an informed electorate. They want a compliant one, an obedient one, a stupid one. 

The very best we can hope for in our system that pretends to be a democracy, is to elect someone every few years that we trust just enough to do what is right. Then leave it to them and hope they don’t screw up too much. 

No, the ideal political system is not democracy but a benign dictatorship. 

Democracy sounds great on paper, and you never know, if someone ever tries it, it might just work. 

But as things stand, at the moment, people are just too fucking stupid for democracy…

Advertisements